Duathlon.com - Leading the duathlon revolution with news, results, and community devoted to duathlons and triathlons.
  Home  |  My Profile   Welcome Anonymous    Become a member! or Login!     


Talk
Photos
Survey
My Profile
Results
News
Interviews
Calendar
Classifieds
Links
Reviews
Need a Coach?
Books
Support this Site
Contact
Support FAQ




Links Search


[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training

from Mark Allen
Website: http://www.markallenonline.com/Default.asp?partner=dua on January 7, 2002
View comments about this article!


Working Your Heart
The secret of training smart

How hard do I have to workout? How far do I have to go? I workout 2 hours every other day of the week and I still can't lose those last 10 pounds. Why do I keep getting injured when I try to run? These are all questions and comments people make about their training that seems to have no simple solution.

I want to give you that solution. It's called a heart rate monitor. Whether your goal is to win a race or just live a long healthy life, using a heart rate monitor is the single most valuable tool you can have in your training arsenal of equipment. And using one in the way I am going to describe will not only help you shed those last few pounds, but will enable you to do it without either killing yourself in training or starving yourself at the dinner table.

I came from a swimming background, which in the 70's and 80's when I competed was a sport that lived by the No Pain, No Gain motto. My coach would give us workouts that were designed to push us to our limit every single day. I would go home dead, sleep as much as I could, then come back the next day for another round of punishing interval sets.

It was all I knew. So when I entered the sport of triathlons in the early 1980's, my mentality was to go as hard as I could at some point in every single workout. And to gauge how fast that might have to be, I looked at how fast the best triathletes were running at the end of the short distance races. Guys like Dave Scott, Scott Tinley and Scott Molina were able to hold close to 5 minute miles for their 10ks after swimming and biking!

So that's what I did. Every run, even the slow ones, for at least one mile, I would try to get close to 5 minute pace. And it worked...sort of. I had some good races the first year or two, but I also suffered from minor injuries and was always feeling one run away from being too burned out to want to continue with my training.

Then came the heart rate monitor. A man named Phil Maffetone, who had done a lot of research with the monitors, contacted me. Phil said that I was doing too much anaerobic training, too much speed work, too many high end/high heart rate sessions. I was forcing my body into a chemistry that only burns carbohydrates for fuel by elevating my heart rate so high each time I went out and ran.

So he told me to go to the track, strap on the heart rate monitor, and keep my heart rate below 155 beats per minute. Maffetone told me below this number that my body would be able to take in enough oxygen to burn fat as the main source of fuel for my muscle to move. I was going to develop my aerobic/fat burning system. What I discovered was a shock.

To keep my heart rate below 155 beats/minute, I had to slow my pace down to an 8:15 mile. That's three minutes/mile SLOWER than I had been trying to hit in every single workout I did! My body just couldn't utilize fat for fuel.

So for the next four months I did exclusively aerobic training keeping my heart rate at or below my maximum aerobic heart rate, using the monitor every single workout. And at the end of that period, my pace at the same heart rate of 155 beats/minute had improved by over a minute. And after nearly a year of doing mostly aerobic training, which by the way was much more comfortable and less taxing than the anaerobic style that I was used to, my pace at 155 beats/minute had improved to a blistering 5:20 mile.

That means that I was now able to burn fat for fuel efficiently enough to hold a pace that a year before was redlining my effort at a maximum heart rate of about 190. I had become an aerobic machine! On top of the speed benefit at lower heart rates, I was no longer feeling like I was ready for an injury the next run I went on, and I was feeling fresh after my workouts instead of being totally exhausted from them.

So let's figure out what heart rate will give you this kind of benefit and improvement. There is a formula that will determine your Maximum Aerobic Heart Rate, which is the maximum heart rate you can go and still burn fat as the main source of energy in your muscles. It is the heart rate that will enable you to recover day to day from your training. It's the maximum heart rate that will help you burn those last few pounds of fat. It is the heart that will build the size of your internal engine so that you have more power to give when you do want to maximize your heart rate in a race situation.

Here is the formula:

Take 180
Subtract your age
Now we need to adjust this number based on your current level of fitness. Make the following correction as it applies to you:

  • If you do no working out subtract another 10 beats
  • If you workout 1-2 times a week subtract 5 beats
  • If you workout 3-4 times a week leave the number as it is.
  • If you workout 5 or more times as week and have done so for a year or more, then add an additional 5 beats to that number.

  • If you are about 60 years old or older OR if you are about 20 years old or younger, add an additional 5 beats to the corrected number you now have.

    You now have your maximum aerobic heart rate, which again is the maximum heart rate that you can workout at and still burn mostly fat for fuel. Now go out and do ALL of your cardiovascular training at or below this heart rate and see how your pace improves. After just a few weeks you should start to see a dramatic improvement in the speed you can go at these lower heart rates.

    Over time, however, you will get the maximum benefit possible from doing just aerobic training. At that point, after several months of seeing you pace get faster at your maximum aerobic heart rate, you will begin to slow down. This is the sign that if you want to continue to improve on your speed, it is time to go back to the high end interval anaerobic training one or two days/week. So you will have to go back to the NO Pain, NO Gain credo once again. But this time, your body will be able to handle it. Keep at the intervals and you will see your pace improve once again for a period. But just like the aerobic training, there is a limit to the benefit you will receive from anaerobic/carbohydrate training. At that point, you will see your speed start to slow down again. And that is the signal that it is time to switch back to a strict diet of aerobic/fat burning training.

    Keep your interval sessions to around15-30 minutes of hard high heart rate effort total. This means that if you are going to the track to do intervals do about 5k worth of speed during the entire workout. Less than that and the physiological effect is not as great. More than that and you just can't maintain a high enough effort during the workout to maximize our benefit. You want to push your interval making each one a higher level of intensity and effort than the previous one. If you reach a point where you cannot maintain your form any longer, back off the effort or even call it a day. That is all your body has to give.

    This is what I did to keep improving for nearly 15 years as a triathlete. It is also the training the Lance Armstrong's coach put him on to recover from his cancer treatment when they saw that he could not handle the high end training anymore. And although it was contrary to what most cyclists do to prepare for the grueling Tour de France, it was what enabled him to capture the title there for the first time in 1999.

    Best of luck!

    Mark Allen
    6 Time Ironman World Champion
    Mark Allen coaching services are available at www.markallenonline.com

    Below:
    Mark Allen
    Photo by Tony Svenson

    0x01 graphic


    Member Comments: Add A Comment
    Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by couretpt on January 7, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    I was first told this by a triathlete/scientist by the name of Chris Eschbach. He tested my anaerobic threshold and VO2 Max, and explained exactly why this stuff works. Now Carmichael and The Grip. This must be the way to go, the results speak fo rthemselves. How many of you guys actually follow this regimen though? Any good results/stories?
     
    Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by DRDUATHLON on January 7, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    Great article. Being a competitive "Type A" person can certainly make this sort of training difficult. But it is very useful.
     
    Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by yosundy on January 7, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    I agree, with those credentials behind it - and many, many, many others - one has to give it a whirl. However, you absulutely must be extremely patient. It does take time, especially if you have never done it before. It's a painfully slow pace at the beginning, and if you like trail runs w/ hills, you'll either have to stay away from them, or even WALK up the hills! Mark Allen himself told me that is what one needs to do to stay in the proper "zone."
     
    Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by MarkLemmon on January 7, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    Can anyone explain how the HR formula works the same for everyone when there is such a variation in maximum HR between individuals? I have a friend who is comparable in conditioning, race times and age to me who will be working significantly harder at 145 HR than me, because his max is lower.

    I'd also like to hear from experienced athletes who have tried this type of training and have made improvements. Thanks.
     
    Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by amart on January 7, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    One more question to add is, How do you equate for body weight? Is the 200 pounder suppose to train at the same HR as the avg 160lbs athlete. (and just for those who wonder, 5 lbs less and call me skeletor)
     
    Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by couretpt on January 8, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    I believe that (and I could be wrong, and I hope Mr. Maffetone doesn't get bent out of shape over this, but...) the training would be more accurate and personalized if it was based on your actual anaerobic threshold or lactate threshold. Meaning that you would train at a percentage (i.e., 60%) of you rlactate threshold , not some formula based on age (not that there is anything wrong with that if you don't have the opportunity to get LT testing), which is pretty generic.
     
    RE: Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by TRI3 on January 8, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    IMO the formula Mark suggests is basically useless for many athletes. I have been using a HR monitor since the late 80's/ early 90's. Since that time I have never seen my HR past 180. 10 years later and my max is about HR 165. Based on Marks formula I have a aerobic HR of 149 (180 - 36 + 5), which is way over my aerobic HR. My Aerobic HR based on testing with those hoses you stick in your mouth and then run on a treadmill is around 118 - 123. If I were to train around the 149 value, I would never see the aerobic effect Mark is talking about. Instead each workout would be pretty tiring.

    My Max HR is 165
    My Wife's Max HR is 210 and she is 38.
    My Roommates Max HR is 190 and he is 32.

    So you can see from above that using Mark's formula wouldn't work for this group.

     
    Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by yomc on January 8, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    I have always wondered wether or not Mark Allen would have acheived those results through Aerobic Training if he hadn't already put in all those years of aneorobic training. If he had started out in the beginning of his career using Maffetone's philosophy would he have had the amount of success he did? I agree that aerobic training can work and is the safest way to train injury free, but can you reach your full potential without pushing yourself to your absolute limits at times?
     
    RE: Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by march66 on January 8, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    Don't forget that he said to start with the slower aerobic work then move to some anerobic workouts to help get over the slide you get from only doing aerobic workouts. I have tried this training and it is extremely boring but it has worked for me. I am slow any way but within 3 weeks my speed was up by over 1/2 mile an hour and things were getting easier. It is very hard to go slow to go fast but remember it's only for a few months then you can add in your speed work. Good luck everyone.
     
    Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by drghs on January 10, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    The Maffatone method that Mark Allen described has some virtue and some vices. I think athletes should embrace the virtues and ponder the vices.

    Virtue 1. It holds athletes back. Most endurance athletes train too hard, and not because they are ambitious. Much overtraining is a product of nerves and insecurity and a lack of emotional self control.
    Any method that holds athletes back a little will tend to reduce overtraining, injuries and illness.

    Virtue 2. It backfills the aerobic "tank." When, as adolescents, most of us started athletics, we had a "base" of years of aerobic play. Then as we age, and over time, school, work and later family devour play time, we increasingly have only the time to carve out a few hours a day for more intense workouts. With this our aerobic tank "empties." You see testimony to this in the descriptions of the fitness of athletes when they started maffatone. Mark allen's 8:15 aerobic pulse is bad, a sign of poor aerobic development,especially for a guy who could run around 46 minutes for 15k. Same with Jan Ripple. Since the anerobic and threshold will tend to linger for a time, the return to slower running "backfills" the aerobic tank, while the others remain developed (at the very least from occasional races.)So they race well.

    Vice 1. The method misses the point sorta. The real lesson of the Maffatone method is that training should be balanced. That really means lots of aerobic, both low and high quality, and prudent doses of anaerobic.
    Many athletes are unbalanced or do too much anaerobic because they set arbitrary training paces ("I run my distance runs at 6:30 no slower") with no real relationship to their physiological capacities. Since many athetes are doing schedules not in balance, backfilling the aerobic simply creates what should have been in place from the outset - balance! When the Maffatone method then adds back in more quality work later, it is ending up where it should have started - with balance. (However, I do think that as a remedial program to fix a program out of balance, it is good to go back to aerobic only for a time. In addition all athletes should have a low quality period each year.)

    2. Vice 2. Arbitrary pulses. The cookie cutter approach to pulses overlooks enormous individual variations in pulse ranges, and thus may undercut the very goal of the system. For example, I am 43 and have a low pulse of 40 and a high of 178. My friend is 45 and has a low of 41 and a high of 210 (we are both male).Thus, if he trains at the Maffatone 140 he is at around 66%, while I would be at 79% at that same pulse. Notice that both of these pulses would be in the aerobic zone, so the goal of keeping training aerobic is accomplished for both of us, but his 140 is lower quality aerobic and my 140 is high quality aerobic. The difference is important.

    Although a 66% pulse is fine for long runs of 6-15 miles, I think workouts like aerobic intervals (like 6-8 x1K at 80% pulse with 1 minute rest) are better when one is pushing the aerobic envelope. If my friend and I go out and try to run together in a distance run at 140 pulse, we will be running more easily than I will be. Over time, if I push that high quality aerobic level too often, I risk injury just as I would if I did too much anaerobic work. In this way, the cookie cutter pulses may actually make training too hard for athletes with low max pulses, even though the training would remain marginally aerobic.

    So it would appear that the high pulse and low pulse figures do matter and that something like the Karvonen pulse rate might be a better bet.I think most athletes would be better served to use the age adjusted Karvonen pulses in their training (not the maffatone) but use that non-Maffatone pulse to accomplish the Maffatone goals - to fill or backfill aerobic capacity and to make training reasonable and balanced.

    Vice 3. Arbitrary Paces. In his book, Maffatone has a chart of Max aerobic paces for given performance levels. These are wildly out of whack. The maffatone pulse for some of the levels are close to 80% pulse and some are as low as 70%. These variations could lead athletes to underpredict or overpredict races or to underpredict or overpredict training paces.
    -----------------

    Bottom Line - There is much to be said for the maffatone idea of making most training more comfortable and largely aerobic, especially for athletes training too hard and too anaerobic. However, the cookie cutter and arbitrary pulses and paces hurt the system. The same system - much aerobic, a little anaerobic - with Karvonen pulses that allow for individual variations in high and low pulse may be a better bet. Notice the latter is much more like what Chris Carmichael recommends. Chris C. warns that the same pulses do not work for Lance and Hincapie for example.Maffatone would have them training at the same pulse.


     
    RE: Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by thegrip on January 16, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    Mark Lemmon wanted to know from some experienced triathletes if my system of training worked. I would consider myself pretty experienced and 6 Ironman titles enough to know that it works.

    The concern he had over different max heart rates is a good concern to raise. However, your switch to anaerobic is not directly linked to max heart rate, and for those who train too high too often, their max will be very high, but without having any faster times.

    His friend who is going faster and has a lower max at 145 is exactly the results that my style of training gives. And the formula is not the same for everyone. It is adjusted to your current and past fitness. It works. The Grip
     
    RE: Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by thegrip on January 16, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    A reply to amart....

    The 200 pounder is going to train at exactly the same heart rates. And if that person is aerobically fit, I hate to say it, but they are going to kick some xz=x## on those skinny guys who do not have an aerobic base.

    The Grip
     
    RE: Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by thegrip on January 16, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    Reply to courtpt.

    The formula is based on age and on level of fitness. A lactate test is actually not that accurate because it is influenced by a huge number of factors that can drive it up or down on the day.

    The formula that I use is based partly on age, which none of us can change, and fitness which we can all influence. The more fit a person, the higher the formula will give them for a training zone.

    But the question is a very good one, and is one of the ongoing debates in coaching circles. The most accurate method of determining zones is expelled gas analysis while exercising. And this actually gives almost exactly the same numbers as you get from the formula. The Grip
     
    RE: Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by thegrip on January 16, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    Reply to yomc:
    I used the heart rate training from 1984-1996. I put in two years of poor training and 13 of smarter training. I did my share of anaerobic work during that time, and there was only one guy crazy enough to go as hard as I went during my speed phase and that was Ken Souza. Hail to the king of duathlon!

    The Grip
     
    RE: Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by MarkLemmon on January 17, 2002 Mail this to a friend!
    Thanks for the response, Grip. I AM NOT WORTHY!!!!
     
    RE: Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    Anonymous post on August 19, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
    test
     
    RE: Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    Anonymous post on August 20, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
    yes
     
    RE: Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by kzod on August 17, 2004 Mail this to a friend!
    If anyone is still reading this, just curious, how would we adjust this formula for days where we do long distances? Not sure how much lower we can go on these days, since Mark says work at that number or below.

    The number I get is consistant with 78% of my Max HR, or 71% of My HRR (heart rate reserve), is this consistent with the numbers others are ghetting maximal benefits from? Given the source, it's good enough for me, my main concern is for long run days (I'm just training for my first Marathon)

    KZ
     
    RE: Mark Allen on Heart Rate Training Reply
    by avv1839 on January 27, 2005 Mail this to a friend!
    Well i read it all it not much more to say BUT about HR is all ways something.I red a book called BETTER TRAINING FOR DISTANCE RUNNERS.It tell you that the best way to find your max HR is to do two 800m easy on the first one and really pushing the second one.Far as aerobic they tell you that should be 60% of the weeks work living 40%as anaerobic.Just to say somthing.armando
     
    Email Subscription
    You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

    Subscribe!
    My Subscriptions
    Subscriptions Help

    Related News & Articles
    Ironman For the New and Experienced
    The Benefits of a CompuTrainer
    USAT Long Distance Triathlon Camp


    Other Upcoming & News Articles
    Buffalo Springs Race Results
    Sarah Haskins and Hunter Kemper Earn Olympic Spots
    Ironman Japan
    Ironman France Results
    Ironman Coeur d'Alene Results

    Web design and content Copyright © 1998-2005 by Eric Schwartz and Duathlon.com
    Unauthorized reproduction of any Duathlon.com material is strictly prohibited and is subject to legal action
    World Headquarters - Boulder, Colorado 
    Contact