Duathlon.com - Leading the duathlon revolution with news, results, and community devoted to duathlons and triathlons.
  Home  |  My Profile   Welcome Anonymous    Become a member! or Login!     


Talk
Photos
Survey
My Profile
Results
News
Interviews
Calendar
Classifieds
Links
Reviews
Need a Coach?
Books
Support this Site
Contact
Support FAQ




Links Search


[Articles Home]  [Add Article]  

Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times

Eric Schwartz (duathlon) on October 22, 2003
View comments about this article!


While the women at Ironman Hawaii are running as fast as ever, the men's marathon record was set in 1989, and 1999 was the last time anyone was within two minutes of Mark Allen's record (2:40:04). Below is a look at the fastest marathons of 2003, the top 20 best of the last five years, and the top 10 fastest of all time.

Top 5 Fastest Runs of 2003

1. Peter Reid

2:47:38

CAN

2. Ryan Bolton

2:50:40

USA

3. Xavier Le Floch

2:52:47

FRA

4. Mika Luoto

2:53:04

FIN

5. Rutger Beke

2:54:12

BEL

Top 15 Fastest Runs of Last 5 Years 1999-2003

1. Olivier Bernhard

2:41:57

1999

SUI

2. Luc Van Lierde

2:42:46

1999

BEL

3. Tim DeBoom

2:45:54

2001

USA

4. Greg Welch

2:46:51

1999

AUS

5. Peter Reid

2:47:38

2003

CAN

6. Peter Reid

2:47:56

1999

CAN

7. Peter Reid

2:48:10

2000

CAN

8. Matthias Klumpp

2:49:56

1999

GER

9. Tim DeBoom

2:49:59

2000

USA

10. Ryan Bolton

2:50:10

2001

USA

11. Tim DeBoom

2:50:22

2002

USA

12. Lothar Leder

2:50:26

2000

GER

13. Peter Kropko

2:50:29

2001

HUN

14. Ryan Bolton

2:50:40

2003

USA

15. Shingo Tani

2:50:50

1999

JPN

16. Frank Heldoorn

2:51:12

1999

NED

17. Tim DeBoom

2:51:23

1999

USA

18. Tamura Yoshinori

2:51:27

2000

JPN

19. Peter Kropko

2:51:28

2000

HUN

20. Christoph Mauch

2:51:29

1999

SUI

Top 10 All Time Fastest Runs

1. Mark Allen

2:40:04

1989

USA

2. Dave Scott

2:41:03

1989

USA

3. Luc Van Lierde

2:41:48

1996

BEL

4. Olivier Bernhard

2:41:57

1999

SUI

5. Mark Allen

2:42:09

1995

USA

6. Mark Allen

2:42:09

1991

USA

7. Mark Allen

2:42:18

1992

USA

8. Luc Van Lierde

2:42:46

1999

BEL

9. Lothar Leder

2:44:58

1998

GER

10. Dave Scott

2:45:20

1996

USA


Member Comments: Add A Comment
Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by Ciaccio on October 22, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
Anyone have a theory on why the men's times can't get any faster. I know these guys are great athletes, I just don't get it.
 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
Anonymous post on October 22, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
haven't you heard?

distance running in the US stinks! an all time low...regressed from the plethora for sub 2:12 marathon times 20 years ago.
 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by trex on October 22, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
http://www.runnersworld.com/home/0,1300,1-0-0-5710,00.html

interview with Deboom prior to IMH - could be inferred that trying to run a 2 40 to run a 2 40 is a big risk ($100,000 on the line) when a 2 47 puts Reid first across the line and 5 minutes to the good of anyone else. Those 2 40 times might have been approached by both Reid and Deboom had Deboom not had kidney stone problems.

Just my take on the slower times, I'm sure there are a number of reasons why.
 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by blaireau on October 22, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
Looking up the total time of the IM with for these best marathon split and also the time of the second person to cross the line could maybe explain why some splits are faster.

Also being fourth forces you to go all out to hope to catch up. Therefore if you do not die trying, makes you have a better split.

In 1989 Allen and Scott where head to head almost all the race. This will assure you of fast run split. Peter had 6 minute on his closes containder. Like the previous post said if Deboom would of ran with Peter, probably Peter would of ran faster to win the race.

My two cent. Hope it is worth more than 2 cents

 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by francoisM on October 22, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
stricter drafting rules...
Funny nearly noone was bugged by Allen saying in 1995
at the award ceremony "thanks guys for the work in the peloton"...you would feel bad for poor Thomas H. working his butt off at the front...
although with the new stagger rule...it is likely going to go back to the low 2.40s...
 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
Anonymous post on October 22, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
francois,
are you Mrs. Thomas H? you seem to be his biggest spokesperson?
 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by francoisM on October 22, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
nope...
Thomas english is quite basic :-)
my best training buddy is Olaf Sabatschus (who knows Thomas a bit).
I like the way Hellriegel races. Goes his own pace, use his strength, tries to break away even if it's impossible because of stupid draft rules (see new stagger rule...)...
not the smartest way, but definitely the most honest.
 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by kemptonslim on October 22, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
Also remember that Mark Allen always had to play catch-up. He would come out of T2 10-12 minutes down sometimes to guys like Dave Scott and Greg Welch and have to mount a 2:40 time to go for the win. Plus he was just a really good runner.
 
Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by BigCalf on October 23, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
The run course has change twice that i know of, maybe more.
 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by trifaster on October 23, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
The run course has changed twice and it is actually easier now than in the past years when they ran 2:40 -2:42. THe main factor being nobody is pushed to run any faster. THe women are pushing each other to run fast or they have been playing catch up to Natascha! Also, take a look at Reids and Debooms first split through about 5 miles ... they were running about 5:40 pace ... FLYING! Granted a fast section but Reid was 15-30sec per mile faster than anyone.
 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by ancharoty on October 23, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
The way the bike segment unfolded, it seemed they would have run sub 2:40. I stood at Kawaihai. From the distance I saw a nice peleton of riders returning from Hawi. I could not believe my eyes as it looked like a stage of the Tour de France approaching. I cleared my stop watch and got someone to do some counting of riders. The end result? 17 riders passed by me in 9.27 seconds. Baffleing. If Eric Schwartz had been in that group, he would have run 2:35.

Amen
 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by duathlon on October 23, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
I think I must have taken a wrong turn at the first buoy, because I lost the leaders on the swim shortly after the gun went off, and after that I had no chance of making the lead group on the bike.
 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by SteveO on October 23, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
Every year that goes by Allen and Scott loom larger...hell, even Hellriegel went 8:06 for 2nd one year...Welch, Hellreigel,and even Christian Bustos look better as time goes by...where are the sub 8:10 times at IMH?....also remember that at other IM's there are some rumors of short runs....
 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by francoisM on October 23, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
same here. I talked with Olaf Sabatschus after the race...most germans were not too happy with the new
drafting rule...
otherwise how to explain 20 guys altogether in T2...
they all improved a lot before Kona?
 
RE: Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by whippett on October 24, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
I followed this discussion and was wondering if the bike splits weren't getting faster at the expense of run splits? Also if this new "stagger" rule won't kill the very thing that made athletes choose the IM distance over the draft legal short stuff?
 
Ironman Hawaii - Men's Marathon Times Reply
by realdeal on October 28, 2003 Mail this to a friend!
The explanation is very simple. True, the older guys were excellent runners and times have not come down. First, let's compare record times to "marathon only" times. In marathons, the world record has been lowered by only 4 minutes since 1978. This covers the time of American and european dominance to the superstars of the kenyans, moroccans and ethiopians.

To follow in triathlon; decreasing the marathon time would be hard enough, but there are other factors. The qualifying and economic aspect of Ironman and Ironman Hawaii make it near impossible. Athletes find themselves having to race more often and at longer distances to qualify and make a living.

A couple of years ago, a cycling phenom named Steve Larsen was going to be waived into Hawaii because of his fame and early success in tri. Many pros protested this because they wanted him to have a full marathon in his legs before competing in Hawaii. Bill Rogers, america's premier long distance runner of the late 70's and early 80's, would only compete in 3 marathons a year with the hope of completing 2.

It is my belief today's athletes are every bit as talented, if not more. The biggest problem going into Hawaii is their legs are simply tired.
 
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.

Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help

Related News & Articles
2001 Ironman Hawaii Qualifiers
Ironman Hawaii - Final News and Notes
Ironamn Hawaii Photos - Men
Ironman Hawaii Auction Starts March 27
2005 Ironman Hawaii Qualifiers


Other Upcoming & News Articles
Buffalo Springs Race Results
Sarah Haskins and Hunter Kemper Earn Olympic Spots
Ironman Japan
Ironman France Results
Ironman Coeur d'Alene Results

Web design and content Copyright © 1998-2005 by Eric Schwartz and Duathlon.com
Unauthorized reproduction of any Duathlon.com material is strictly prohibited and is subject to legal action
World Headquarters - Boulder, Colorado 
Contact