2003 USAT Elections Upheld
from
BJ Hoeptner Evans/USA Triathlon
on
January 9, 2004
View comments about this article!
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (Jan. 9, 2004) - After considering a complaint lodged by four candidates in the 2003 USA Triathlon Board of Directors election, the USA Triathlon Board of Directors voted 5-2 Thursday to let the election results stand. The complaint, as filed by 2003 Board candidates Karen Buxton (Greensboro, N.C.), John Duke (Cardiff, Calif.), Mike Greer (Canyon, Texas) and Robert Vigorito (Columbia, Md.), alleged that USA Triathlon bylaws were violated in the conduct of the election. They contended that technical aspects for approval of the election process were not completed. Had the complainants been successful, part or all of the 2003 election most likely would have been rerun.
Thursday's discussion and vote were done in a telephone conference call that was run by Tucson, Ariz., lawyer and former USA Triathlon Board president Jonathan Grinder. Four current members of the Board who were candidates in the 2003 election - Valerie Ellsworth-Gattis (Louisville, Ky.), Jim Girand (Palo Alto, Calif.), Diane Travis (Clermont, Fla.) and Jack Weiss (Euless, Texas) - were not permitted to participate in the discussion or voting. However these four members and three of the four complainants did listen in on the call. Two other members of the 2003 Board - Eric Schwartz (Boulder, Colo.) and Amanda Pagon (Glenn Dale, Md.), both elite athlete representatives who did not run for re-election - had a voice in the discussion, but no vote.
Those voting in favor of the complainants were Brad Davison (Austin, Texas) and Ray Plotecia (Ruxton, Md.). Those voting against were Eric Bean (Palo Alto, Calif.), Tim Becker (Seattle, Wash.), Kevin Carter (Silver Spring, Md.), Susie Gallucci (Colorado Springs, Colo.) and Fred Sommer (Clermont, Fla.). In discussing the complaint, the Board members all acknowledged that there were election deficiencies and that major modifications would be implemented immediately for future elections.
However, those that voted against the complaint contended that all 2003 candidates operated under the same election rules and had the same ability to be elected. The system used in the 2003 election (to select directors for the 2004-05 term) was similar to election procedures held over the past several years.
|
2003 USAT Elections Upheld
|
Reply
|
|
Anonymous post on January 12, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
From the various stories available on-line I gather this vote to uphold the election was contrary to the legal opinions received by USAT. There was also the suggestion by the former board members involved that a vote to uphold the election would result in looking for a remedy in court, dragging this issue out for some time. Couple that with the resignation of the Executive Director of USAT and this gives the impression of an organizaton in a state of disarray. Bad timing in an Olympic year.
|
|   |
|
RE: 2003 USAT Elections Upheld
|
Reply
|
|
by itsallgood on January 13, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
impression of an organizaton in a state of disarray?
I think we are seeing more than an impression -
The reality IS a organization in disarray!!
|
|   |
|
2003 USAT Elections Upheld
|
Reply
|
|
by tricarl on January 13, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
It seems that the Florida Republican Party in now in control of the USAT elections process.
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Related News & Articles
2000 USAT Age Group Rankings
USAT Honors Volunteers
US Will Send 14 Athletes Per Age Group To Triathlon Worlds
USAT Election Results
USAT Election Results
Other Upcoming & News Articles
Raf Baugh Interview
USAT Qualifying for Duathlon World Championships
Bronda’s Run Bike Duathlon
Powerman Malaysia
Treasure Island Triathlon
|