Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
Eric Schwartz (duathlon)
on
October 26, 2004
View comments about this article!
Last week it became public information that Belgian triathlete Rutger Beke tested positive for EPO. Beke finished second at Ironman Hawaii in 2003 and fifth in 2004. He was reported to have tested positive for EPO with his A and B samples at a triathlon in Belgium on September 1. Belgian news reports indicated that Beke, 27, was notified of the positive test on September 20. Further stories on his positive test mentioned his high hematocrit level, however there was no indication that his hematocrit levels were 50% or higher, which is the level that would trigger sanctions. A positive EPO test is unrelated to hematocrit levels.
Chris McCrary, a US based representative for Beke, said in an interview that Beke's positive test was leaked to the press and that it should not have been made public until further steps had been taken in the judicial process. It is unknown who leaked the information. Because the case was still in process, Beke was not prohibited from racing at Ironman Hawaii even though he was aware of his positive test. If the positive test holds up Beke will not be awarded, or will have to return, his $12,500 prize money from this year's Ironman Hawaii and will be disqualified from the race. Beke was also drug tested after Ironman Hawaii.
According to McCrary, the next step in the process for Beke is to meet with the Belgian authority handling the case, which should take place within the next 8 weeks. “Rutger and his team will be given access to the details of both the A and B samples. They will be allowed to do their investigation,” said McCrary. “As of Sunday Beke still had not been given access to his testing records.”
Beke maintains his innocence and vows to fight the case. According to McCrary, Beke is “absolutely devastated by this. He is confused. He is depressed. He knows for a fact that he has not used any banned substance.” McCrary also added, “The bottom line is that we are going to be open with all of the information, regardless of whether it is good or bad news for Rutger.”
The following statement was released last week by Chris McCrary of Katalyst Multisport Management:
San Francisco, CA - On behalf of Rutger Beke, Katalyst Multisport Management and the Arinso-Bik Triathlon Team we would like to shed some light on the serious allegations that have been made public about Rutger Beke in the last 48 hours.
First and foremost, Rutger Beke emphatically denies EVER using any illegal performance enhancing products. He has been an outspoken opponent of the use of such products and is perplexed and saddened by what has happened. Rutger plans to do everything in his power to get to the bottom of this situation and clear his name. Rutger has been tested numerous times in his professional career and has never submitted a positive test. Rutger and his wife Sophie are currently in route back to Belgium from Hawaii.
On September 1, 2004 Rutger Beke won the Knokke Triathlon in Belgium. He voluntarily submitted a urine sample for testing and complied with all pre and post race testing protocol. This has been the case for the past several years at this race and Rutger had no reason to avoid any testing since he has never used any illegal substances.
The initial testing of Rutger's A-sample and B-sample was positive for EPO. However, it is important to understand that this is only one step in a very delicate and sensitive protocol that must be followed precisely before a final ruling is made. The testing of EPO in urine is not an exact science by any stretch of the imagination and there are numerous outside factors that could result in a false positive test. There should not be a rush to judgment based solely on the current facts. Until such time as all protocols have been accurately administered, verified and a final ruling handed down, Rutger should be considered innocent of any improprieties.
Rutger and the Arinso-Bik Triathlon team have assembled a team of experts including Jan Olbrecht to review the way in which the samples were collected, stored and tested. Additionally, they will study Rutgers biological makeup to help determine how he could have produced a positive EPO test when in fact he has never used any such product. In fact, Rutger has voluntarily agreed to be followed and tested for as long as it takes to understand how his body could have produced this type of result.
Clearly this is a very difficult and emotional time for Rutger and his wife Sophie. His sponsors Arinso and Bik along with his team members and Katalyst Multisport Management support Rutger 100%. A rush to judgment in this type of situation is not warranted and we ask for your patience as we unravel this situation. We will continue to provide as much information as possible in the coming weeks to support his innocence.
|
Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
by rnerWSC on October 26, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
If both of the A and B results were found positive why was he allowed to race in Hawaii. Further more if you are going to dope and you get caught the results should be made public so the press and the court of public oppinion can fry you.
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
by duathlon on October 26, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
It's hard to get a solid answer on the process (it can differ by sport and country), but my understanding is that the athlete has a right to see the results and question them before he is considered guilty and the results are made public. The athlete is also usually not suspended until after that happens.
|
|   |
|
Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
by AY on October 26, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
That’s is good news that something start going on with doping control in triathlon (Ironman particularly) I will not talk about things I don’t know for sure, can’t prove or guessing, just try to explain my thoughts (sorry for bad English).
First - I know there is doping in the Sport.
Then - I know there is no doping control at Ironman races in US and Europe (at least not for top three in Florida, CDA – I was there, Austria – my friend won it 3 times, so on...) They told me that top 3 in Hawaii will be tested, but who taking care of that and where is official statements?
I know that for sure that there is no big problem to find-bay staff like EPO, somatotropin, etc…
Now, what may stop athletes from using it? Ironman is hard sport with no good pay and to be able keep training and racing one has to win or make podium, or quit. I don’t want to quit, so probably many others. We (pro) are FORCED to use drugs because there is no doping control and every athlete will be afraid that others use it, so he has choice to be not competitive and quit with serious sport or USE THE DRUGS.
Then even if you win and you clear – so there is no prove of that and anybody can say – “there was no doping control, so….”
Words do not mean much in our age of Kali. Whatever Beke is innocent or not, should be proven by strong system of anti doping, I will not blame Rutger even in second case (guilty), but hope organizers of our events will take next step to bring beautiful sport of triathlon to pure existence, even if they lose some $ with doping scandals in the beginning (business reason in case of disqualifying some top - one of my thoughts, sorry if I wrong)
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
by goldie on October 26, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
So if they don't test for drugs does that make it alright to use them,because you think everyone else is using them????
I don't think so.
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
by AY on October 26, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I didn’t say (and don’t think) that that is alright. That’s why I trying to bring this subject from underground, actually. That is not alright for athletes now and even worth in the future (when you young there is a lot of ignorance in one’s mind and a lot of desires...)
There is some things that can stop you (inner and outer – that’s another big subject)
In this case I have hope that Erik and Duathlon.com has some influence (to me it’s good and popular site) to move that stone.
|
|   |
|
Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
Anonymous post on October 27, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
Can anyone really believe that an athlete (or non-athlete) does NOT know that he/she is taking drugs of any kind? Ben Johnson, anyone? The ones who take these illegal and unethical substances know it and get no sympathy from me when they get caught. (It is just like getting caught drafting and claiming "Jeez, I didn't know that I was!") Gimme a break! Drug use is wrong and self-destructive in the long run--ask Caminiti's family--and it does a great disservice to the sport. Knock it off!
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
Anonymous post on October 27, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
An update on a French website says that there was an error in protocol in the testing…
http://www.duathlon-info.com/Triathlete/Default.asp
The urine was not frozen during transport.
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
Anonymous post on October 28, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Just because the urine was transported unfrozen ( when it should have been frozen ) doesn't take away from the fact that the lab found traces of a banned substance, in other words the temperature of the urine dose not automatically produce a banned substance.
Aside from this the question remains, if the sport does not enforce and announce that they will test at IM races , then athletes will abuse or be tempted to abuse the system. We know from cyclying that positive tests cause sponsers to pull out, so I can see why a race would not want to " have " the potential of one positive test at their event. Like most things in our society its all about the bottom line, money.
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
by mikef on October 28, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
seem to read a lot of challenges to the drug positives due to irregularities in testing, handling, etc. You would think a format would be drafted that anyone involved in the drug testing process - lab personnel, transporters of samples, etc - would follow. The absence of this provides not only the guilty to have an avenue but potentially exposes innocent people to risk..
As an ex bodybuilder (didn't say I was good at it, just did it) I really got discouraged in that it was impossible to get anywhere in the sport w/out "gear" (drugs). Anyone you see in a Weider mag is on the juice. Anyone in the top 50 in Mr Olympia is on the juice. FABB has drug testing policy but it's an absolute joke and they know it. No one is caught any more if you use any sense at all in your drug cycle. the powers to be in the sport don't want the sport cleaned up, people want to see freaks on stage and in the mags and the sport would die if all you had was guys that looked like I did. Weider knows this, he is no fool. Why the digression? Body building got the way it did due to a governing body that started off disorganized than deliberately looks the other way. I hope cycling and multisport develops a good testing protocol and penaltys with some real teeth to keep it from becoming a joke.. ok, I'm done rambling
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
by goldie on October 28, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Whenever an athlete tests positive, they immeadiately claim their innocence.
I don't recall anyone saying"yeah I take performance
enhancing drugs"
Not only cheats but liers also.
Having said that due to the high volume of training and subsequent injuries sustained by elite athletes,I feel that steroids should be accessable to them under controlled conditions to recover.
They deserve the right to earn an income and some drugs will speed up the healing process allowing them to race sooner.
How you control this process I am not sure.
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
by bradja on October 28, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
There needs to be a zero tolerance policy toward PED's. If we make it OK for elite athletes to use them, then what about the college athletes and the high school athletes that think they can be elite athletes one day. Why not them?
We are dealing with a situation in high school xc and track right now where one team is being accused of steroids or some form of doping because of the meteoric rise in performance by the entire team in a few short months.
Stop the use of drugs altogether in athletics.
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
by mikef on October 28, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Allowing some use of PEDs within a sport is a recipe for disaster. People those inclined to use are not going to limit use within a guideline intended to maintain a level playing field. Using the bodybuilding model, no one goes in intended on using monstrous doses of testosterone, clenbuterol, diuretics but it ends up that way if you intend to stay competetive. If someone told me I could inject 100c of dianabol 1x a month to facilitate recovery and prevent muscle mass loss, trust me when I tell you that I will soon be double that, as soon as I get my ass kicked in an "A" race. I'll have the mindset of "if I get busted, so what I'll be no worse off than I am now". plus think of the costs to test almost everyone at the elite level if any amount of PED use is allowed.
PS I seem to recall Olivier Berhard getting caught testing postive for Nandrolone some years ago, but he seemed to go quitely on this. I recall hearing about it and his suspension but I don't remember reading him claiming someone bugged his tootpaste or some nonsense like that.. kudos to him to taking his medicine like a sport.
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
Anonymous post on October 29, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Some more news:
IM Florida Pro Newsletter:............
.........· 7.00am: Race start (If we are able to change the pro start will be at 6.25am)
· Post race interviews - Top three male and female finishers (barring a medical issue) need to be available to the media for interviews. This allows athletes to handle their media inquiries all at one time and then be free to rest and enjoy the remainder of the event. If a medical issue does occur that is not major, you may be asked to return for a brief interview period.
Is it gona be serious or just as Mike says "a joke"? Will Oliver make podium this time?
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
by dionjelley on October 29, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Drugs are ripe in all sports and it would be niave to think that the top triathletes and duathletes aren't taking something.
Look at the British Cyclist David Miller 8 year pro and never tested positive but admitted to using EPO throughout his career.
Is EPO and such drugs like RSR 13 really any worse they someone taking a protein or creatine supplement or something like Cordyceps? They both enhance performance and are both manufactured?
I don't agree with drug taking but there is alot to think about and Genetic modification is probably the next step.
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
by mikef on October 30, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Is EPO and such drugs like RSR 13 really any worse they someone taking a protein or creatine supplement or something like Cordyceps.
Hell yes it is! no one has dropped dead from cordyceps, creatine or protein supplements, like they have from EPO. Not to mention the grocery list of long term side effects for those who have been long term abusers. I can ramble for several paragraphs about anabolic steroids, clen, ma huang, insulin, but don't think I'll be telling anyone something they don't know.
There is a difference between food supplements and drugs that manipulate hormone production, red blood cell production and metabolism in that the food supplements generally are harmless unless taken in ridiculous quantities.
|
|   |
|
RE: Rutger Beke's Positive EPO Test
|
Reply
|
|
by AY on October 31, 2004
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
How we can save our bodies?
Erik, may be you can create anti doping topic on your site where people can send ideas, info, etc. on that matter?
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Other Upcoming & News Articles
Fall Racing Preview
Ironman Louisville
Ironman Canada Results
Chicago Triathlon Results
Timberman 70.3 Triathlon
|