USAT and Ironman Split
from
BJ Evans of USA Triathlon
on
June 13, 2005
View comments about this article!
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (June 13, 2005) - Citing the importance of athlete safety and a fair playing field, USA Triathlon has announced that it will no longer sanction events owned by the World Triathlon Corporation (WTC) or Ironman North America (IMNA). The move comes in reaction to WTC's desire to establish a global rule book for its races that is not in compliance with USA Triathlon's rules. "We believe our rules provide the safest races and the fairest competition," said Skip Gilbert, executive director of USA Triathlon. "The WTC's new rules would not meet USAT's strict requirements for safety. We cannot insure races that do not follow those parameters. That could jeopardize the 1,500 races we sanction and our 58,000 annual members as a whole."
The USAT Competitive Rules were written to provide athletes safety and overall fairness in competition. They also provide each athlete maximum protection from unfair or arbitrary penalties. Every violation an official calls in a race is intensively reviewed by the senior referee and penalties are assessed after the review. Athletes have a right to discuss and appeal calls that may be unfair. The WTC has asked that an exception be granted to this procedure to allow real-time stand-down (on-course) penalties for age group triathletes. This exception would remove all review, due process, and rights of appeal and put the final decision in the hands of one official. Stopping a motorcycle in traffic could also endanger both the athletes and the official.
"This is truly a sad day for us," Gilbert said. "In the grand scheme of things, triathlon is a small sport and we need unity, not division." WTC has said that it has 50,000 athletes who compete globally. USA Triathlon embraces more than 200,000 one-day and annual members. "We are a non-profit sport national governing body and this decision will cost us significant membership revenue," Gilbert said. "But our priority must be to put our athletes and race directors first, not the impact to our bottom line." The USA Triathlon Board of Directors has given its unanimous support to the decision.
"Skip provided the Board with two strong options; one a compromise, and the other a removal of the sanction," said Brad Davison, president of the USA Triathlon Board of Directors. "In a conference call last Wednesday (June 8), Skip recommended the latter course of action and, based on a number of factors, the Board gave its unanimous approval." This decision means that athletes who compete in WTC or IMNA-owned races will not be afforded any of the benefits that would be available at a USA Triathlon sanctioned event, to include national ranking, and qualification for national and world championships.
Moreover, Gilbert called on the WTC and IMNA to refund to the athletes any money it has already received on behalf of USA Triathlon for one-day licenses. However, Gilbert did not close the door on a relationship with WTC down the line. "If they want to come back to the table and work with us, we would love to help them establish a global rulebook that would make everyone happy."
|
USAT and Ironman Split
|
Reply
|
|
by AY on June 15, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Great job WTC and IMNA!!! Do not let ITU take over our sport. Monopoly isn't good thing in any aspects of life (except Love and God)
This situation looks different when you read WTC-GTG report: http://vnews.ironmanlive.com/vnews/topstories/1118633730/
Off cause as always there is $ involved, but I would rather tryst Paula and Greg (not being against USAT – they are good)
|
|   |
|
USAT and Ironman Split
|
Reply
|
|
by AY on June 15, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
USAT cites their split "Citing the importance of athlete safety and a fair playing field, USA Triathlon has announced that it will no longer sanction events owned by the World Triathlon Corporation (WTC) or Ironman North America (IMNA
Tell me please what is fair about USAT officials DQ'ing a competitor last week ( who won the race ) after the race was over as she was spotted on her bike in the parking lot with out a helmet on, I understand the safety issue, but this could have been handled in another way. also athletes getting penalty for littering on the course when there race number blew off from their race belt without their knowledge, is seems that USAT officials are out antongize and not define a fair playing field
I personally got penalty for drafting the guy who was 200 yards away and I could not see (pay attention) on what side of road he was. Nothing I could do post race
|
|   |
|
USAT and Ironman Split
|
Reply
|
|
by markcarey on June 15, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
I wonder if anybody has ever won an appeal for an
on-course penalty they received. Plus, Ironman used to have stand downs in some of their USAT sanctioned races, was this a new rule or did Ironman just ignore it in the past.
Now the USAT rankings will lose most of their validity. The elite of this sport race in either Ironman or Olympice Distance, some do both but most emphasize one or the other. Now all USAT top ranked athletes will be those who travel to Nationals and Worlds. If WTC-IronmanNA are smart they will start their own ranking system. Maybe 2 seperate ranking systems makes sense anyway.
We'll see how it works out all I know is that every WTC and Ironman NA race I've done has been organized and run very professionally. I've done MANY USAT sanctioned races that have been less than safe.
Mark
|
|   |
|
RE: USAT and Ironman Split
|
Reply
|
|
by JAMESCAGNEY2000 on June 15, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
Best move the WTC could have made. USA Triathlon is useless to the average athlete. It didn;t take the most successfull series in triathlon to figure that one out.
JIM
|
|   |
|
RE: USAT and Ironman Split
|
Reply
|
|
by mikef on June 17, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
|
agree USAT does zip for the average athlete, $9 per race tossed into the wind. If they want to take their ball and go home, let 'em. Don't let it hit you in the fanny on the way out
|
|   |
|
RE: USAT and Ironman Split
|
Reply
|
|
by User101 on June 30, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
AY,
Where was this race that DQ'd a winner for riding in the parking lot after the race?
Thanks
Mike
|
|   |
|
RE: USAT and Ironman Split
|
Reply
|
|
by AY on July 8, 2005
|
Mail this to a friend!
|
THis race was in Tennessee and put on by team magic
why Mike? are you an USAT official?, if so then what is all this about USAT officials can not officiate in WTC events, by whose authority does USAT have to say where one can and can not officiate, next thing they will tell me I can't umpire at my local little league games, USAT needs a wake up call and a rival governing body in the US ( like what was gogin on years back with USA Swimming and their split ) to get the sport going in the right direction
|
|   |
|
Email Subscription
You are not subscribed to discussions on this article.
Subscribe!
My Subscriptions
Subscriptions Help
Other Upcoming & News Articles
Miami International Triathlon
IM China and 70.3 Results
Ironman New Zealand
Desert Classic Duathlon Elite Results
Ironman Malaysia
|